MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137201549 · doi:10.1521/ijgp.54.2.177.40392

Concurrent Group and Individual Psychotherapy in a Psychiatric Day Hospital for Depressed Elderly

2004· article· en· W2137201549 on OpenAlexaff
Ken Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Group Psychotherapy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychotherapistGroup psychotherapyPsychologyCountertransferenceTransferenceAntidepressant medicationPsychiatryDay hospitalPsychiatric diagnosisClinical psychologyAntidepressantCognitionPsychoanalytic theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concurrent psychotherapy is used in various settings for patients of different diagnoses and ages. The concurrent group and individual psychotherapy of older adults with depressive disorders in a psychiatric day hospital is described, emphasizing phases of treatment and transference and countertransference themes uniquely relevant to working with depressed elderly patients in a day hospital. Case examples are offered to illustrate these issues. The special technical considerations that need to be utilized when multiple therapists and settings are present are described. The model employs the use of an integrative, interactive group therapy, along with various other group treatments and antidepressant medication, with individual therapy serving a subordinate but organizing role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Group PsychotherapySame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207