MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137201549 · doi:10.1521/ijgp.54.2.177.40392

Concurrent Group and Individual Psychotherapy in a Psychiatric Day Hospital for Depressed Elderly

2004· article· en· W2137201549 on OpenAlex
Ken Schwartz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Group Psychotherapy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBaycrest Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychotherapistGroup psychotherapyPsychologyCountertransferenceTransferenceAntidepressant medicationPsychiatryDay hospitalPsychiatric diagnosisClinical psychologyAntidepressantCognitionPsychoanalytic theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concurrent psychotherapy is used in various settings for patients of different diagnoses and ages. The concurrent group and individual psychotherapy of older adults with depressive disorders in a psychiatric day hospital is described, emphasizing phases of treatment and transference and countertransference themes uniquely relevant to working with depressed elderly patients in a day hospital. Case examples are offered to illustrate these issues. The special technical considerations that need to be utilized when multiple therapists and settings are present are described. The model employs the use of an integrative, interactive group therapy, along with various other group treatments and antidepressant medication, with individual therapy serving a subordinate but organizing role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it