Bridging the Divide: Building Asia-Pacific Capacity for Effective Reforms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article spotlights the need to develop capacity for ICT policy and regulation within developing countries. It argues that capacity should to be developed among all stakeholders, not solely within government agencies, because that would enable effective participation by many players in the regulatory process. The resulting participatory regulatory process will in turn increase accountability and procedural legitimacy. The article examines different approaches to developing in situ expertise, especially just-in-time learning and open-source research. Keywords: Asia-Pacificcapacity buildingfield buildinginformation and communication technologiesjust-in-time learningopen-source researchresearch networkstelecommunications reform This article is based on the keynote presentation at the Digital Opportunity Forum 2006, Seoul, August 31, 2006. The helpful comments of the LIRNEasia colloquium participants, especially Sherille Ismail, Helani Galpaya, Divakar Goswami, and Kabir Hashim, (at: http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/08/colloquium-on-bridging-the-divide-building-asia-pacific-capacity-for-effective-reforms/, consulted 11 August 2006), are gratefully acknowledged. Some of these ideas were first presented in an address to the International Symposium organized by the Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Belihuloya, 7 July 2006. This research was supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) of Canada. Notes 1. http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?pagePK=642-83627&piPK=73230&theSitePK=40941&menuPK=228424&Pro-jectid=P042263 and http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/main?pagePK=64283627&piPK=73230&theSitePK=40941&menu-PK=228424&Projectid=P077586 (accessed September 17, 2006). 2. Final text at: http://www.lirneasia.net/2005/03/national-early-warning-system/and draftat:http://www.lirneasia.net/wp-content/Con-cept%20Paper%203Feb05_01.pdf (accessed August 11, 2006) Comparison of draft and final text will show how much weight was given to the comments. 3. Indeed, it may be hypothesized that research on research networks has been bedeviled by conflation of scholarly networks (associated with field building or maintenance), research networks and virtual organizations. See CitationStein et al. (2001), CitationHildreth and Kimble (2004), CitationMonge and Contractor (2004), CitationShiffrin and Borner (2004), and CitationWind (2005). 4. On Euro CPR, see http://www.encip.protectorg/eurocpr.php. TPRC's origins are documented by CitationOwen (1997).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it