MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137217287 · doi:10.37236/1588

Gaps in the Chromatic Spectrum of Face-Constrained Plane Graphs

2001· article· en· W2137217287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Electronic Journal of Combinatorics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsChromatic scalePlane (geometry)GraphSpectrum (functional analysis)ColoredFace (sociological concept)Complete coloringFractional coloringDiscrete mathematicsGraph powerPhysicsGeometryLine graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $G$ be a plane graph whose vertices are to be colored subject to constraints on some of the faces. There are 3 types of constraints: a $C$ indicates that the face must contain two vertices of a $C$ommon color, a $D$ that it must contain two vertices of a $D$ifferent color and a $B$ that $B$oth conditions must hold simultaneously. A coloring of the vertices of $G$ satisfying the facial constraints is a strict $k$-coloring if it uses exactly $k$ colors. The chromatic spectrum of $G$ is the set of all $k$ for which $G$ has a strict $k$-coloring. We show that a set of integers $S$ is the spectrum of some plane graph with face-constraints if and only if $S$ is an interval $\{s,s+1,\dots,t\}$ with $1\leq s\leq 4$, or $S=\{2,4,5,\dots,t\}$, i.e. there is a gap at 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it