MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2137265467 · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-10-s2-a57

Co-exposure to allergen and diesel exhaust enhance inflammatory responses in human airway submucosa

2014· article· en· W2137265467 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Ali Hosseini, Tillie‐Louise Hackett, Jeremy A. Hirota, Kelly M. McNagny, Chris Carlsten

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAllergenMedicineAirwaySubmucosaDiesel exhaustDiesel fuelImmunologyAllergyAnesthesiaPathologyWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is a chronic condition described by inflammation of the airways and lungs. Diesel exhaust (DE) is a major contributor to ambient particulate matter (PM) air pollution. There is rising evidence that PM acts as adjuvant on the immune responses and may lead to augmentation of allergic inflammation [ 1 , 2 ]. We aim to elucidate if DE increases allergen-induced inflammation and cellular immune response in the airways of atopic human subjects. 15 volunteer participants with allergy to house dust mite allergen (Der p 1), birch or Timothy grass were recruited. In a randomized fashion, subjects inhaled DE (300µg PM 2.5 /m ) or filtered air for 120 minutes. One hour following the exposure, the extract of an aeroallergen to which the individual is sensitive, or placebo (sterile saline), was instilled into contralateral lung segments through bronchoscopy. Endobronchial biopsies from these same segments were then acquired 48 hours after each exposure. This was repeated 4 weeks later in each subject with the alternative inhalant. Thus, biopsies under 4 different conditions were created: filtered air + saline (FAS), DE + saline (DES), filtered air + allergen (FAA) and DE + allergen (DEA). Biopsies were processed and embedded in glycol methanlacrylate acrylic resin and serial sections were cut to 2µm and used for immunostaining with monoclonal antibodies to tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). The percent positivity and distribution of activated mast cells (tryptase+) and eosinophils (ECP+) were quantified in the bronchial submucosa by Aperio ImageScope software. The percent positivity for tryptase expression: FAS=0.54±0.05, DES=0.51±0.18, FAA=0.63±0.24, DEA= 0.94±0.23. The percent positivity for ECP expression: FAS=0.35±0.17, DES=0.38±0.11, FAA=0.61±0.14, DEA=0.73±0.33. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n=6). Our preliminary data suggest that DE may enhance the inflammatory response to allergen in atopic individuals. This data is novel in the context of human lung tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→