MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137277132 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2007.897662

Log-Shifted Gamma Approximation to Lognormal Sum Distributions

2007· article· en· W2137277132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLog-normal distributionCumulative distribution functionProbability density functionMathematicsRange (aeronautics)Moment (physics)Applied mathematicsStandard deviationRandom variableStatisticsGamma distributionFunction (biology)Matching (statistics)Statistical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes the log-shifted gamma (LSG) approximation to model the sum of M lognormally distributed random variables (RVs). The closed-form probability density function of the resulting LSG RV is presented, and its parameters are directly derived from those of the M individual lognormal RVs by using an iterative moment-matching technique without the need for curve fitting of computer-generated distributions. Simulation and analytical results on the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the sum of M lognormal RVs in different conditions indicate that the proposed LSG approximation can provide better accuracy than other lognormal approximations over a wide cdf range, especially for large M and/or standard deviation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it