An experimental and numerical study on hydraulic characteristics and theoretical equations of circular weirs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to streamline curvature, non-hydrostatic pressure distribution, and nappe adherence on the weir wall, the discharge coefficient of weirs is less than 1.0. However, in cylindrical weirs, the discharge coefficient extends to values more than 1.0 due to the different pressures and velocity distributions. In this study, pressure and velocity distributions of different circular weirs are simulated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and Fluent software and compared with experimental results. The numerical results of CFD show a significant correlation with measured data from manometers and a laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV). Experimental observations show that the critical flow depth forms before and after the crest for greater and smaller discharge coefficients, respectively. Nappe separation depends on overflow discharge and will shift to the downstream face of the cylinder in high discharges. To recognize the location of critical flow and nappe separation, analytical formulations are proposed depending ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it