MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137285362 · doi:10.1002/aic.14655

Parallel models for arborescent polyisobutylene synthesized in batch reactor

2014· article· en· W2137285362 on OpenAlexafffund
Yutian R. Zhao, Kimberley B. McAuley, Judit E. Puskás

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIsobutyleneCarbocationPolymerMonte Carlo methodCopolymerThermodynamicsReaction rate constantStatistical physicsMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryComputational chemistryChemistryKineticsPhysicsMathematicsOrganic chemistryClassical mechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model is developed for estimating kinetic parameters that influence the production of arborescent polyisobutylene via carbocationic copolymerization of inimer (IM) and isobutylene. Six different propagation rate constants arise due to the two types of vinyl groups and three types of carbocations. These six parameters are estimated using parallel simulation systems in PREDICI that track (1) functional groups, (2) internal and dangling segments in the polymer, and (3) concentrations of IM and polymer molecules. Parameter estimates obtained using the proposed model result in a better fit to literature data than was obtained using a previous model that neglected two types of propagations reactions. Predictions from the proposed model are consistent with Monte Carlo simulations for molecular weight distribution of the internal and dangling segments. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 253–265, 2015

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207