EM-coupling removal from time-domain IP data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electromagnetic (EM) coupling of frequency-domain induced polarisation (IP) data has been the subject of many studies, and a number of ‘de-coupling’ procedures have been devised. However, there has been far less emphasis on coupling in the time domain, the normal approaches being to wait until late times and assume the EM contribution is insignificant or, less frequently, to invoke a Cole-Cole model to account for the EM-coupling response. A fast and simple procedure has been devised for suppression of EM-coupling effects in time-domain IP data. The essence of the approach is to represent the EM-coupling as a half-space decay. The half-space resistivity (EM apparent resistivity) is adjusted via inversion until the fit to the observed transient voltage decay is optimal in the least squares sense. The EM voltages associated with this best-fitting EM half-space decay are then subtracted from the measured voltages to yield a de-coupled ‘IP transient’. Transients that are well represented by an EM half-space decay are deemed ‘non-responsive’ in the context of IP. Transients that deviate markedly from an EM half-space decay are indicative of high apparent chargeability. The application of the new procedure is illustrated on dipole-dipole IP data from the Yandal greenstone belt of Western Australia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it