MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137307484 · doi:10.1109/icarcv.2004.1469792

Motion detection and tracking system based on frame analysis and simulated static electric field (SSEF) snake

2005· article· en· W2137307484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceObject detectionTracking (education)Frame (networking)Video trackingEdge detectionObject (grammar)Tracking systemMotion analysisMonochromatic colorMotion estimationPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Image processingKalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The entire framework of the motion detection and tracking system is demonstrated in the paper. Series of processes have been developed to perform tracking activities. The system consists of inter frame analysis, estimation of active object region, edge map calculation and thinning, closed contour finding and object extraction with the simulated static electric field (SSE ) snakes. Lots of synthetic and real image sequences (simulate consecutive frames of video) are tested in the tracking system. These image sequences are of different types of cases such as a monochromatic object and a textured object with a complex background, and deformable object with fixed scene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207