NaviStar<sup>®</sup>ThermoCool<sup>®</sup>catheter for ventricular tachycardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the relatively short history of catheter ablation, it has clearly demonstrated high efficacy and safety in treating a wide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias. An important contributor to this success has been the rapid incorporation of evolving technologies that have changed the practice of electrophysiology remarkably. The introduction of irrigated radiofrequency ablation has allowed electrophysiologists to tackle complex arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, with a higher success rate. Similarly, the introduction of 3D mapping systems has enhanced our understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms and allowed for integration of electrophysiologic and anatomically guided ablation. In 2006, the US FDA approved the Navistar ThermoCool ablation catheter, which incorporates an irrigated tip design with electroanatomical guidance, for ventricular tachycardia ablation. The design of this catheter, its clinical profile, its potential advantages and possible complications associated with its use in ventricular tachycardia ablation are discussed herein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".