MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137330762 · doi:10.1002/mop.21370

Calculation of antenna array far field impulse response using the finite-difference time-domain method

2006· article· en· W2137330762 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Wu, Jim Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodNarrowbandOpticsPhysicsRadiation patternAcousticsImpulse responseImpulse (physics)Slot antennaWaveformTime domainNear and far fieldDipole antennaElectronic engineeringAntenna (radio)RadarEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The waveform in the radiation field of a radar antenna can be obtained by using the convolution of the transmitted signal and the antenna far-field impulse response (AFFIR). In this paper, the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is applied to calculate the AFFIR of an X-band 54-element waveguide slot array at different radiation angles using the excitation of a wideband Gaussian pulse. To demonstrate the usage of the far-field impulse response, the waveforms in the radiation field of a narrowband Gaussian pulse are calculated at three different radiation angles by the convolution of the pulse and the waveguide slot-array AFFIR. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 48: 424–430, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.21370

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207