MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thermal Route for Chemical Modification and Photoluminescence Stabilization of Porous Silicon

2000· article· en· W2137345368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (a) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural SciencesSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescencePorous siliconMaterials scienceSiliconPorous mediumThermalPorosityChemical engineeringChemical modificationNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsComposite materialPolymer chemistryEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes photoluminescence (PL) stabilization through chemical modification of freshly prepared porous silicon (PSi) surfaces. As-anodized PSi surfaces react with 1-alkenes, non-conjugated dienes and aldehydes at elevated temperatures to form organic monolayers covalently bonded to the surface. This thermal route is very general and tolerant of different functional groups. We have characterized these organic monolayers using diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform (DRIFT), Auger and Raman spectroscopies. The PL intensity and peak energy of the as-anodized PSi is not affected by the chemical functionalization. Aging these derivatized PSi samples in ambient air has no effect on the PL. In fact, it is completely preserved even when they are steam treated for six weeks at 70 °C and 100% humidity. This treatment completely destroys the structural integrity of H-terminated PSi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it