MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137347599 · doi:10.1109/nafips.2004.1337360

Intelligent medical diagnosis system using the fuzzy and neural networks

2004· article· en· W2137347599 on OpenAlexaff
Yasue Mitsukura, Kayoko Miyata, Kensuke Mitsukura, Minoru Fukumi, Norio Akamatsu, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkAsynergyComputer scienceVentricleArtificial intelligenceFuzzy inference systemPhonocardiogramBackpropagationFuzzy logicPattern recognition (psychology)Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemData miningComputer visionFuzzy control systemCardiologyMedicineHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various imaging diagnostic technologies are studied and used in practical. It is necessary to develop the automatic diagnosing processing system for detecting the internal organ. In Japan, cardiac disease is one of the most common cause of death. Therefore, it is necessary to measure cardiac function quantitatively and evaluate the motions of continuous cardiac muscle. Moreover, we propose the developing the system to detect the asynergy in the left ventricle. The processing images are X-ray photograms of the left ventricle by cardiac catheterization. In this paper, we propose the detection system of the asynergy in the left ventricle by using neural networks and the fuzzy inference. Furthermore, in order to show the effectiveness of the proposed method, we show the simulation example by using the real data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.Same topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207