MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137391703 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2004.836056

A Digital Blind Background Capacitor Mismatch Calibration Technique for Pipelined ADC

2004· article· en· W2137391703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuccessive approximation ADCCapacitorCalibrationComputer scienceAnalog-to-digital converterSIGNAL (programming language)Dynamic rangeElectronic engineeringEffective number of bitsElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new digital background calibration technique to compensate for the capacitor mismatch in pipelined analog-to-digital converter (ADC) is presented. A digital signal from the ADC output is constructed so as to transform the capacitor mismatch to gain error. A simple modification to the conventional multiplying digital-to-analog converter (MDAC) allows the ADC to toggle between different configurations to create a reference signal used to calibrate blindly the ADC in the background. The creation of this signal does not produce any limitation for the ADC in terms of speed or degrading the input dynamic range. Simulation results show the effectiveness of this new method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it