MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137401544 · doi:10.1002/glia.20500

ATP‐induced chemotaxis of microglial processes requires P2Y receptor‐activated initiation of outward potassium currents

2007· article· en· W2137401544 on OpenAlexaff
Long‐Jun Wu, Kunjumon I. Vadakkan, Min Zhuo

Bibliographic record

VenueGlia · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemotaxisMicrogliaBiologyCell biologyMotilityReceptorP2Y receptorPotassium channelKinaseBiochemistryBiophysicsInflammationImmunologyPurinergic receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microglial cells are the resident macrophages that are involved in brain injuries and infections. Recent studies using transcranial two-photon microscopy have shown that ATP and P2Y receptors mediated rapid chemotactic responses of miroglia to local injury. However, the molecular mechanism for microglial chemotaxis toward ATP is still unknown. To address this question, we employed a combination of simultaneous perforated whole-cell recordings and time-lapse confocal imaging in GFP-labeled microglia in acute brain slices from adult mice. We found that ATP-induced rapid chemotaxis is correlated with P2Y receptor associated-outward potassium current in microglia. Activation of both P2Y receptor and its associated potassium channels are required for ATP-induced chemotaxis and baseline motility of microglial cells. The chemotaxis required the activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase but not mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Our results provide strong evidence that P2Y receptor-associated outward potassium channels and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway are important for ATP-induced microglial motility in acute brain slices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations157
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGliaSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207