MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137406371 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ket009

Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss: the otology-rheumatology interface

2013· review· en· W2137406371 on OpenAlexaff
Tamara Mijović, Anthony Zeitouni, Inés Colmegna

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSensorineural hearing lossOtologyAudiogramTinnitusHearing lossRheumatologyNeurotologyAudiologyAudiometryDermatologyOtorhinolaryngologySurgeryInternal medicineHead and neck surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoimmune sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is a rare clinical entity characterized by a progressive fluctuating bilateral asymmetric SNHL that develops over several weeks to months. Vestibular symptoms, tinnitus and aural fullness are present in up to 50% of patients. Due to the lack of specific diagnostic tests, both clinical suspicion and responsiveness to corticosteroids are the pillars for the diagnosis of autoimmune SNHL. The evaluation of patients in whom this condition is suspected should include a detailed history and physical examination, an audiogram, an MRI and a limited laboratory workup to exclude secondary causes of hearing loss. The low frequency of this condition, the heterogeneity in the designs of the available studies and the absence of randomized trials comparing treatment responses and assessing long-term outcomes are some of the factors accounting for the limited evidence to guide the clinician in the approach to the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune SNHL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations127
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207