MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137463972 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277664

Repeater Sizing and Insertion Length of Interconnect to Minimize the Overall Time Delay using a Truncated Fourier Series Approach

2006· article· en· W2137463972 on OpenAlexafffund
S.J. Nagalakshmi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveformTime domainComputer scienceFourier seriesElectronic engineeringTransmission lineInterconnectionFrequency domainRepeater (horology)Series (stratigraphy)SizingVery-large-scale integrationAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computation of accurate time domain signal waveforms in VLSI interconnects, taking into account the distributed inductance of the line, has grown in importance with increasing clock speeds. A computationally efficient truncated Fourier series method for computing time domain waveforms is summarized in this work. The method assumes excitation of the VLSI interconnect modeled in the frequency domain, by periodic trapezoidal waveforms. The problem of optimizing repeater size and interconnect insertion length to minimize time delay in long interconnects, taking into account the transmission line nature of the interconnect using this Fourier series method is developed in this work. The Nelder-Mead simplex optimization technique is used to perform the actual optimizations. At each step of the Nelder-Mead iteration, the candidate interconnect length and repeater scaling at that iteration is used to evaluate the output time response using the truncated Fourier series. The results of the optimization by this method are compared with that obtained by a fourth-order Fade approximation based optimization technique in the literature. The results of the two optimization studies show significant differences in overall optimized time delay per meter. The differences are attributable to the error in the Fade approximation of the transfer function of the interconnect and terminations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207