Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation in Synaptosomes and Liposomes by Nitrates and Nitrites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NO is produced endogenously from arginine by the action of NO synthase, and exogenously by nitrovasodilators, including organic nitrates and nitrites. NO has been proposed as a cytotoxic and cytoprotective agent. There is strong evidence that NO acts as an apparent antioxidant in inhibiting lipid peroxidation, via chain termination, and interestingly lipid nitrates and nitrites have been proposed to be products of this chain termination. Both pro- and antioxidant mechanisms may be drawn for nitrates and nitrites; therefore, their effects on lipid peroxidation were measured in two systems, using tocopherol, thiol, and an NO donor for comparison: (1) rat cerebrocortical synaptosomes with Fe(II)-induced lipid peroxidation measured by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and (2) phospholipid liposomes with an azo-initiator induction system, quantified by a fluorescent probe of peroxide formation. In contrast to the classical nitrate nitroglycerin, novel nitrates which release NO on reaction with thiols and two novel nitrates which spontaneously generate NO in aqueous solution inhibited lipid peroxidation. i-Amyl nitrite inhibited lipid peroxidation, and its properties were further studied with ESR spectroscopy. The data show that classical nitrites and novel nitrates are not prooxidants, but inhibit lipid peroxidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".