MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137553264 · doi:10.1061/9780784479216.006

Creating a Performance-Based Asphalt Mix Design to Incorporate Oil Sand

2015· article· en· W2137553264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Vrtis, Pedro Romero

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsAsphaltGradationPetroleumEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringGeologyArchaeologyGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sustainability of pavement projects can be improved by incorporating locally available materials. It has been shown that successful utilization of local materials is beneficial for the local economy, the environment, the contractor, and the owner. However, the use of innovative materials is often inhibited by current method-specifications. The objective of this research was to use performance-based testing and modern mix design tools to develop a special provision allowing for the use of oil sand in a bituminous pavement. Oil sand is a naturally occurring petroleum deposit comprised of heavy bitumen, sand, clay and water. The largest oil sand deposits, located in western Canada, are well known for crude oil production from oil sand. Oil sand is also available throughout the United States in smaller deposits where converting oil sand to crude oil is not feasible. In certain areas immediately surrounding oil sand deposits, contractors have been paving with oil sand asphalt mixtures for over a century; even though, modern mix-design methods have not been used to characterize these mixtures. To address this need and allow for contractors to use oil sand pavements on state funded jobs, a special provision was created for the Utah Department of Transportation utilizing oil sand from eastern Utah. The steps followed to create this provision were: oil sand characterization, volumetric-mix design, and laboratory testing. The oil sand was characterized by determining the bitumen content, the gradation, and temperature susceptibility. The mix design was created following a procedure similar to the method used to gap-graded hot mix asphalt. The special provision created from this research outlines the required oil sand characterization and laboratory testing that must be completed to design an oil sand asphalt pavement. Although this research concentrated on incorporating oil sand into bituminous mixtures, the methodology developed could be extended to provide a performance based testing framework to any innovative material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207