MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137583011 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2007.901089

Data Mining Approach to Threshold Settings of Islanding Relays in Distributed Generation

2007· article· en· W2137583011 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingDistributed generationRelayComputer scienceNetwork topologyProtective relayResource (disambiguation)Electric power systemDistributed computingSet (abstract data type)Data miningEngineeringPower (physics)Computer networkElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a new approach for determination of the threshold settings of islanding relays in distributed generation (DG) interconnections. This approach uses data-mining technology to extract the optimal relay settings information from a large data set of system parameters. This data is constructed from offline simulation analyses of events and consequences. The mining of these consequences defines the boundary limits of the threshold settings that could secure the detection of islanding operations under: minimum detectable zones, multiple distributed resources (DRs), diverse distributed resource technologies, various operating conditions, and different network topologies. The approach is tested on a typical DG with multiple distributed resources, and the results indicate that this approach can be used effectively to support the setting relay decision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it