MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137651354 · doi:10.1504/ijex.2013.053390

Exergy efficiency factors for transportation: updated Reistad estimates

2013· article· en· W2137651354 on OpenAlexafffund
David Bligh, V. Ismet Ugursal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Exergy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExergyEfficient energy useComputer scienceEstimationEnvironmental scienceExergy efficiencyEconometricsProcess engineeringMathematicsEconomicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies that involve the estimation of the energy and exergy efficiencies of the transportation sector commonly use the operating efficiency estimates of the different modes of transportation that date back to 1970. Considering the improvements in operating efficiency realised since 1970 in all modes of transportation, the use of these estimates in current studies may cause inaccuracies in the results obtained. In the absence of comprehensive new studies and estimates to replace the 1970 estimates, this paper presents a set of operating efficiency estimates that were obtained by modifying the original estimates using published values that reflect the improvements in energy efficiency since 1970.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ExergySame topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207