Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Taking John Willinsky's observation that in Canadian identity politics, the question ‘who am I?’ often necessitates the additional question ‘where is here?’ (Willinsky, 1998), this article examines excerpts from interviews with a group of teacher education students in order to explore how they used family (hi)stories about ‘country of origin’ in the construction of their identities. Making ‘country of origin’ problematic, the article also examines the limits and possibilities of being and becoming Canadian. ‘Where are you from?’ complicates and challenges the entitlement to belong. Drawing on critiques by Canadian educators, the article challenges the widely held significations given to Canadian immigration and to official policies of multiculturalism. By juxtaposing data from eight interviews, the issue of racial identity is explored, in terms of how it appears or does not appear in the stories the students tell. These juxtapositions highlight the unofficial intersections between Canadian identity, race and ethnicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it