A fluorescent compound for glucose uptake measurements in isolated rat cardiomyocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A focus of current diabetes research is the development of insulinomimetic compounds for oral treatment of diabetes and its associated cardiac complications. Screening compounds for their potential insulinomimetic effects usually involves the use of radioactive isotopes. The focus of this study was to investigate a nonradioactive fluorescent compound for its use in screening insulinomimetic compounds. The indicator 2-(N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)-2-deoxyglucose (2-NBDG) has been used by some workers to measure glucose uptake in Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. We propose that 2-NBDG will also be a suitable indicator for mammalian cell lines, in particular rat cardiomyocytes. We found that the indicator could give a reliable reproducible standard curve following appropriate dilution and is taken up by isolated cardiomyocytes. The insulinomimetic compounds vanadyl sulfate and sodium molybdate showed rates of glucose uptake similar to that of insulin. Furthermore, the rate of uptake measured for insulin using this technique (0.04 +/- 0.003 nmol x min(-1) x 10(6) cells(-1) is comparable with previous literature using 2-deoxyglucose uptake measurements on isolated myocytes (0.040 nmol x min(-1) x 10(6) cells(-1), demonstrating the validity of this fluorescent compound for glucose uptake studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".