Ionizing radiation induces iNOS-mediated epithelial dysfunction in the absence of an inflammatory response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ionizing radiation induces intestinal epithelial hyporesponsiveness to secretagogues through an unknown mechanism. We investigated the role of the inducible isoform of nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS)-derived NO in radiation-induced hyporesponsiveness. C57BL/6 mice were sham treated or exposed to 10-Gy gamma-radiation and were studied 3 days later. Tissues were mounted in Ussing-type diffusion chambers to assess chloride secretion in response to electrical field stimulation (EFS) and forskolin (10 microM). Transport studies were also repeated in iNOS-deficient mice. White blood cell counts were significantly lower in irradiated mice, and there was no inflammatory response as shown by myeloperoxidase activity and histological assessment. iNOS mRNA levels and nitrate/nitrite concentrations were significantly elevated in irradiated colons. iNOS immunoreactivity localized to the epithelium. Colons from irradiated wild-type, but not iNOS-deficient, mice exhibited a significant reduction in the responsiveness of the tissue to EFS and forskolin. The hyporesponsiveness was reversed by L-N(6)-(1-iminoethyl)lysine, 1400W, and dexamethasone treatments. iNOS-derived NO mediates colonic hyporesponsiveness 3 days after irradiation in the mouse in the absence of an inflammatory response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".