Seismic demand of moderately ductile reinforced concrete shear walls subjected to high-frequency ground motions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A parametric study was performed to examine the seismic behaviour of moderately ductile (MD) reinforced concrete shear walls designed according to Canadian code provisions, including National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) 2010 and Canadian Standards Association (CSA) 23.3-04, when subjected to typical high-frequency eastern North America earthquakes. The numerical models were experimentally validated based on large specimens shaking table test results. The results obtained following the code response spectrum procedure were compared with the results from inelastic response history analyses to investigate the effect of higher modes on seismic force demands. The results indicate that current code provisions for MD shear walls need to be modified. A new base shear factor and shear force design envelop are proposed to evaluate the seismic shear force demand more realistically. This study also recommends that the current CSA 23.3-04 requirements for ductile shear walls for bending moments could be applied to constrain the location of inelastic flexural deformations at the base of MD shear walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".