MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137723331 · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32087-4

Canadian Consensus Conference on Osteoporosis, 2006 Update

2006· article· en· W2137723331 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jacques P. Brown, Michel Fortier, Heather Frame, André B. Lalonde, Alexandra Papaioannou, Vyta Senikas, Chui Kin Yuen, Elke Henneberg, Chantal Capistran, Jackie Oman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsThe Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of CanadaCongress of Aboriginal PeoplesManitoba Beekeepers' Association
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGuidelineMedicineOsteoporosisFragility fractureMEDLINEBone mineralFamily medicineTask forcePhysical therapyBone densityEvidence-based medicineAlternative medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0130.014
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0130.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2006
Admission routes4
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207