Age is independently related to muscle metabolic capacity in premenopausal women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether muscle metabolic capacity was inversely related to age after adjusting for physical activity in sedentary premenopausal women. Eighty-three women (ages 23-47 yr) had their free-living, activity-related energy expenditure evaluated with doubly labeled water procedures, and room calorimeter determined sleeping energy expenditure. Maximum O(2) uptake and strength were evaluated in all subjects, whereas 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy determined metabolic economy during maximal exercise, and muscle biopsy maximal enzyme activity was evaluated in subsets of the sample (48 and 18 subjects, respectively). Age was significantly related to whole body treadmill endurance time (r = -0.32), plantar flexion strength (r = -0.29), maximum O(2) uptake (r = -0.27), (31)P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy ADP recovery rate (r = -0.44), and anaerobic glycolytic capacity (r = -0.37), and muscle biopsy citrate synthase activity (r = -0.48), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (r = -0.54), phosphofructokinase (r = -0.62), and phosphorylase (r = -0.58) activity even after adjusting for activity-related energy expenditure. These data suggest that, in sedentary premenopausal women, both oxidative and glycolytic muscle capacity decrease with age even when physical activity is taken into account.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".