MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P1-S6.05 Influence of social support networks on the HIV transmission risk behaviours of people living with HIV in Manitoba, Canada

2011· article· en· W2137788141 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alun Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Transmission (telecommunications)GerontologySocial supportEnvironmental healthVirologyTelecommunicationsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) positive social support networks (SSNs) can help improve quality of life, overall well-being, coping, and decrease mood disturbance, morbidity, mortality, sexual and substance associated HIV transmission risk factors. However, HIV diagnosis can cause a negative change in SSNs leading to social isolation (actual/perceived) and increase risk of HIV transmission behaviours. Having an effective strategy to encourage the development/maintenance of SSNs may have a positive effect upon the health outcomes and HIV transmission risk behaviours of PLWHA. Objective To describe the SSNs of Manitobans living with HIV/AIDS (MLHA) and determine the influence of SSNs on transmission risk behaviour. The relationship between independent variable (size and type of SSNs- positive/negative) and dependant variables (sexual risk behaviour, and alcohol, injection and non-injection drug use) was examined. Control variables included: age, gender, ethnicity, time since diagnosis, and sexual orientation. This data was collected in the Positive Prevention Study (PPS), a cross-sectional survey which included 135 MLHA aged 18 plus. The PPS assessed a broad list of transmission related determinants and only enrolled people if they were aware of their HIV diagnosis for at least 6 months, allowing for analysis of sustained positive behavioural changes. For this analysis SAS statistical software was used. Analysis of variance was done between the size and type (positive/negative) of SSNs and the chosen transmission risk behaviours; sexual behaviour, alcohol use, injection and non-injection drug use. Analysis of covariance was conducted with independent, dependent and control variables. Multiple regression analysis was run with independent and dependent variables to determine any relation. Level of social support achievable depends on one's attachment to those in their SSN and the role they play. It is not just the quantity of people but also the quality of relationships (eg, frequency, perceived support) that defines the success of SSNs. Not all SSNs are positive; some types may increase transmission risk behaviour. Only positive SSNs (regardless of size) are associated with avoidance of transmission risk behaviours. The results of this study help to assess the degree to which SSNs affect the sustainability of long-term secondary prevention measures, and thus inform groups offering services to MLHA with local scientific evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207