MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137816277 · doi:10.1345/aph.19297

Bupropion-Induced Serum Sickness–Like Reaction

2000· article· en· W2137816277 on OpenAlexaff
Robert A. McCollom, Dean Elbe, Alec H Ritchie

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Pharmacotherapy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsRichmond Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBupropionMedicineRashEmergency departmentIngestionAnesthesiaIncidence (geometry)NauseaDermatologyInternal medicinePsychiatrySmoking cessation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report three cases of serum sickness-like reaction (SSLR) associated with bupropion ingestion. CASE SUMMARY: A 27-year-old woman, a 46-year-old man, and a 43-year-old woman presented to our emergency department within a three-week period with symptoms consistent with SSLR. Symptoms consisted of pruritic skin rash, tongue swelling, and arthralgias. All three patients had initiated bupropion therapy within two to three weeks prior to arrival. DISCUSSION: This is the second published case describing SSLRs associated with bupropion. Reports of urticaria and rash with bupropion use are numerous and the incidence has been estimated at between 1% and 4%. Arthralgia and arthropathy with bupropion use are reported much less commonly. The onset of symptoms of SSLRs typically begins six to 21 days after administration of the causative agent. SSLRs are usually self-limiting, lasting four to 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: SSLRs following bupropion ingestion appear to be rare. However, the fact that this cluster of patients presented to our emergency department within a three-week period suggests that this reaction may be underreported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of PharmacotherapySame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207