MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137840793 · doi:10.1177/1470412909354254

Nancy on Film: Regarding Kiarostami, Re-Thinking Representation (with a Coda on Claire Denis)

2010· article· en· W2137840793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visual Culture · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)CodaGazePresentation (obstetrics)Principal (computer security)Art historyMovie theaterEpistemologyArtAestheticsSociologyPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article considers Nancy’s thinking about film in the light of his writings on art in general. Nancy contends that what is so commonly considered ‘representation’ is more properly understood as presentation, even, perhaps counter-intuitively, in the domain of film. Nancy proposes that the principal dynamic in Kiarostami’s exemplary films turns on the regard, the gaze that is not simply looking but even proximate to thinking. The article also briefly considers Claire Denis’ L’Intrus (The Intruder) as a compelling example of a film responding to Nancy’s text of the same name and of his thinking more generally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it