Study of the Raman spectra of phonons in disordered GaSb/AlSb (001) superlattices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present work, we study the influence of disorder in the Raman spectra of the phonons of (GaSb) n /(AlSb) n (001) superlattices (SLs), for n = 1, 2. Τhe disordered superlattices are approximated with primitive cells that are much larger than the primitive cells of the corresponding perfect SLs. We propose that disorder appears because of deviations from the sequence of the GaSb and AlSb layers, which is imposed by symmetry, or because of intermixing of Ga and Al in the cation lattice planes. The dynamical matrix of each SL is constructed from the combination of the dynamical matrices of the bulk crystalline constituents, which have been calculated at certain points of the Brillouin zone with a ten-parameter valence overlap shell model. Further, we have calculated the Raman spectra of the disordered 1 × 1 and 2 × 2 superlattices grown along the (001) direction, using an eight-parameter bond polarizability model, away from resonance conditions. Our results show that intermixing of Ga and Al cations produce Raman activity that is not present in the phonon spectra of perfect superlattices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".