MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137858913 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2004.1329082

Analysis of Internet topology data

2004· article· en· W2137858913 on OpenAlex
J. Chen, Ljiljana Trajković

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet topologyThe InternetRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceLaplace operatorTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyData miningComputer networkWorld Wide WebMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Discovering Internet topology is important for analyzing routing protocols and Internet robustness and resilience. Recent research results dealing with Internet topology, such as the discovery of power-laws and the application of normalized Laplacian analysis to Internet topology data, have increased the need for more complete datasets and their more rigorous interpretations. In this paper, we examine datasets from two sources: Route Views and RIPE. We show that each dataset may have a geographical bias and, consequently, consist of distinct routes. Furthermore, by employing normalized Laplacian analysis, we identify distinct cluster characteristics that could not be inferred by directly examining the collected data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraph theory and applicationsFrench-language works237,207