MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2137867640 · doi:10.1109/vecims.2011.6053839

E-dumbbell: An electronic dumbbell with haptic feedback for wrist rehabilitation

2011· article· en· W2137867640 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Karime, A. Rahman, Hussein Al Osman, Wail Gueaieb, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDumbbellWristHaptic technologyRehabilitationComputer scienceAccelerometerHuman–computer interactionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInterface (matter)SimulationArtificial intelligencePhysical therapyMedicineAnatomyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the design and implementation of a wrist rehabilitation system that is cheap and simple is presented. E-dumbbell consists of a regular dumbbell mounted with an accelerometer and a pair of vibro-tactile actuators that allow the dumbbell interface to interact with a two dimensional Ping-Pong game. The main purpose of the system is to enable patients to perform their daily wrist training in a convenient and entertaining manner. The system can be adapted to fit the needs of different patients with different rehabilitation levels by allowing patients to customize the difficulty level of the game. The training sensory data are stored in a database that could be used by the therapist to track his/her patient's progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→