Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les élus locaux en Europe. Un statut en mutation., Élodie Guérin-Lavignotte, Éric Kerrouche, 2006, Paris : La Documentation française, 158 pages. Cet ouvrage porte sur les signes et les effets de la professionnalisation des élus locaux en Europe, un sujet dont la pertinence sociale et académique est sans équivoque. Les transformations du contexte et du contenu de l'action publique locale appellent une meilleure connaissance de ceux qui en sont responsables : les élus locaux. La démarche empruntée ici est ambitieuse puisqu'il s'agit de saisir de façon comparée les conditions d'accès et d'exercice des mandats électifs locaux dans l'Europe des 25. Pour ce faire, les auteurs travaillent la notion de statut – status – d'élu local et la confrontent à la diversité des réalités nationales. En cela, l'ouvrage diffère des travaux français portant sur un objet assez proche, le métier d'élu, généralement traité sous la forme monographique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".