Beamforming in Dual-Hop Fixed Gain Relaying Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of beamforming in dual-hop cooperative networks with fixed-gain relays is investigated. These kinds of relays offer low complexity and ease of deployment when compared with variable-gain relays. In our analysis, the source and destination nodes are equipped with multiple antennas, whereas the relay is assumed to be a single-antenna device. Closed-form expressions for the outage probability (OP), probability density function (PDF), moment generating function (MGF), and generalized moments of the end-to-end signal-to- noise ratio (SNR) are obtained. It is shown that when the same antenna configurations are considered at the source and destination sides, the power imbalance between the hops may be either beneficial or detrimental for the overall system performance. In addition, depending on whether the average SNR of the second hop is equal, lower, or higher than that of the first hop, an increase of the number of antennas may not necessarily result in a substantial improvement in performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".