MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137939963 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1991.155308

Mean-variance backpropagation: a connectionist learning algorithm with a selective attention mechanism

2002· article· en· W2137939963 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Lacouture

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackpropagationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceConnectionismRpropArtificial neural networkAlgorithmVariance (accounting)Mean squared errorMachine learningAsymptoteGradient descentPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsStatisticsTypes of artificial neural networksRecurrent neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified version of the backpropagation learning algorithm called mean-variance backpropagation (MV-BP) is presented. It uses gradient descent to minimize a weighted mixture of the overall mean and variance of the squared-errors computed across the stimulus set. Applied on a network with enough resources, the MV-BP learning algorithm yields learning curves similar to those observed with the standard backpropagation learning algorithm but with faster learning. When the new learning algorithm is used on a network with limited resources, learning is still faster, but performance asymptotes at a higher level of mean-square error. The proposed MV-BP learning algorithm might not find the best solution, but it is probably more adequate for modeling human cognitive learning since it allocates the resources in such a way that performance tends to be similar on all stimuli.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207