MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137942025 · doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2038294

Detection of Narrow-Band Signals Through the FFT and Polyphase FFT Filter Banks: Noncoherent Versus Coherent Integration

2010· article· en· W2137942025 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFast Fourier transformPolyphase systemComputer scienceSignal processingNormalization (sociology)Electronic engineeringFilter bankFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmComputationDetection theoryDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Formulas are derived for computing performance gain that is achieved by coherent integration over noncoherent integration in detection schemes based on polyphase fast Fourier transform (FFT) and FFT filter banks. Numerical computation of the processing gain is then discussed. The crucial role that is played by window energy normalization in detection performance comparisons, which has never been recognized in the literature, is emphasized and analyzed. The numerical results provided for typical implementation parameters are useful for making appropriate tradeoffs in the design of solutions for practical signal detection problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it