MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137954089 · doi:10.7202/031810ar

Superviseurs universitaires et formation pratique en milieu scolaire : orientation de la médiation entre théorie et pratique

2007· article· fr· W2137954089 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Fernand Gervais

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude porte sur l'intervention des superviseurs universitaires dans la formation pratique en milieu scolaire. L'auteur dégage les axes d'orientation d'un groupe d'intervenants dans ce domaine, sous l'angle d'une médiation entre la théorie et la pratique. Il établit une catégorisation des formes d'interprétation qui illustre leur approche, en recourant à la méthode de la théorie ancrée. Les résultats apportent un éclairage quant au cadre à partir duquel l'intervention du superviseur universitaire se structure et quant au lien avec les croyances sous- jacentes au rapport entre théorie et pratique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207