MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137992400 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.578

Improving INS/GPS Navigation Accuracy through Compensation of Kalman Filter Errors

2006· article· en· W2137992400 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Goodall, Zainab Syed, Naser El‐Sheimy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial navigation systemKalman filterGPS/INSComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemNavigation systemResidualFilter (signal processing)Compensation (psychology)Noise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Control theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterReal-time computingAssisted GPSArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAlgorithmTelecommunicationsInertial frame of reference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kalman filter is often used to integrate satellite navigation systems with inertial navigation systems. Such integrated systems are especially useful for navigation of vehicles in urban environments where satellite signals are frequently blocked by tall buildings. The filter weights the measurements of both navigation systems to provide an overall optimal solution. Unfortunately, an optimal solution is only achieved when the filter has been supplied with ideal a priori information such as proper measurement noise characteristics and system dynamics. If such parameters are not perfect they can be detected and compensated for using an intelligent navigation scheme which is adaptable to different sensors. As dynamics are encountered, satellite signal blockages are simulated to test the optimality of the filter. A neural network is then trained to learn any residual deterministic errors which are then removed from future system drifts during signal blockages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Vehicular Technology ConferenceSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207