MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137992400 · doi:10.1109/vtcf.2006.578

Improving INS/GPS Navigation Accuracy through Compensation of Kalman Filter Errors

2006· article· en· W2137992400 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial navigation systemKalman filterGPS/INSComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemNavigation systemResidualFilter (signal processing)Compensation (psychology)Noise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Control theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterReal-time computingAssisted GPSArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAlgorithmTelecommunicationsInertial frame of reference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kalman filter is often used to integrate satellite navigation systems with inertial navigation systems. Such integrated systems are especially useful for navigation of vehicles in urban environments where satellite signals are frequently blocked by tall buildings. The filter weights the measurements of both navigation systems to provide an overall optimal solution. Unfortunately, an optimal solution is only achieved when the filter has been supplied with ideal a priori information such as proper measurement noise characteristics and system dynamics. If such parameters are not perfect they can be detected and compensated for using an intelligent navigation scheme which is adaptable to different sensors. As dynamics are encountered, satellite signal blockages are simulated to test the optimality of the filter. A neural network is then trained to learn any residual deterministic errors which are then removed from future system drifts during signal blockages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it