MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137996345 · doi:10.1126/science.1221840

Standards and Infrastructure for Innovation Data Exchange

2012· article· en· W2137996345 on OpenAlexaff
Haak Laurel, David Baker, Donna K. Ginther, Gregg Gordon, Matthew A. Probus, Nirmala Kannankutty, Bruce A. Weinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsCanadian AIDS Society
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsBusinessData exchangeKnowledge managementIndustrial organizationComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data on the global R&D enterprise are inconsistently structured and shared, which hinders understanding and policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.083
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.155
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0830.155
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0140.021
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0230.032
Open science0.0070.018
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207