MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138001221 · doi:10.1306/12161414060

The Paleozoic Hudson Bay Basin in northern Canada: New insights into hydrocarbon potential of a frontier intracratonic basin

2015· article· en· W2138001221 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denis Lavoie, Nicolas Pinet, Jim Dietrich

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleozoicGeologyStructural basinBayFrontierPaleontologyOceanographyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The Hudson Bay Basin is the largest intracratonic basin in North America, although it is the only one without any proven hydrocarbon reserves. The stratigraphic succession that fills the basin consists mainly of Paleozoic strata, with a maximum preserved thickness of about 2500 m (8202 ft). The Paleozoic succession includes Ordovician to Devonian shallow marine carbonates, reefs, and shales with locally thick Devonian evaporites. The Paleozoic strata are locally unconformably overlain by a thin Mesozoic and Cenozoic cover of nonmarine and marine strata. From 1964 to 1985, over 46,000 line-km (28,600 mi) of seismic reflection data were acquired, and four onshore and five offshore exploration wells were drilled. The data acquired at that time led to pessimistic conclusions on source rocks and the thermal rank of the basin and resulted in the stoppage of exploration activities. However, hydrocarbon shows or indicators were identified in well log data and seismic reflection profiles. The likelihood of an active petroleum system has also been recently supported by recognition of pockmarks on the seafloor and possible marine oil slicks identified on satellite images. New studies of geological, geophysical, and biostratigraphic data reveal that the Hudson Bay Basin had an irregular subsidence and uplift history. Syntectonic deposition occurred during the Late Ordovician(?) to Early Devonian and sag-basin deposition during the Middle to Late Devonian. The basin contains four unconformity-bounded sequences, with significant depocenter migration over time. Analyses of petroleum-system data indicate the Hudson Bay Basin has higher petroleum potential than previously considered. Porous platform limestones, reefs, hydrothermal dolomites, and siliciclastics form potential hydrocarbon reservoirs. Upper Ordovician organic-rich shales with type II-S organic matter are recognized at several locations in the basin. Newly acquired organic matter reflectance and Rock-Eval Tmax data indicate Ordovician–Silurian strata locally reached the oil window. Basin modeling demonstrates significant potential for oil generation and expulsion from Ordovician source rocks. Five petroleum play types are identified in the Hudson Bay Basin, including an untested fault-sag or hydrothermal dolomite play. The synthesis of the petroleum system information indicates that the Hudson Bay Basin is, at least locally, prospective for oil accumulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207