MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138013760 · doi:10.1177/1528083712447311

Coating carbon fibres with hybrid polymers for use at high temperatures

2012· article· en· W2138013760 on OpenAlexaff
Masud Rana, MA Shayed, RD Hund, C. Cherif, Abdul Awal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial Textiles · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Wear Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermogravimetric analysisCoatingComposite materialThermal stabilityPolymerUltimate tensile strengthScanning electron microscopeMicroscale chemistrySubstrate (aquarium)Carbon fibersContact angleAdhesionChemical engineeringComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A thermal resistance coating of different high temperature resistance polymers, e.g. polysilazane and polysiloxane was applied to a carbon roving by a continuous dip coating method. Improved mechanical and thermal resistance properties of the coated carbon roving were evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis and tensile property testing under thermal stress. Investigation of the mechanical properties of coated carbon roving revealed a significant increase in their breaking strength, which amounted to more than 50% as compared to uncoated roving. The thermal stability as well as the oxidation protection of the coated sample in ambient air at temperatures up to 800℃ was much higher than that of the control sample. Topographical phenomena occurring due to the coating on the microscale were examined by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis. The surface energy and the adhesion property of the coated substrate were determined by measuring the contact angle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial TextilesSame topicTribology and Wear AnalysisFrench-language works237,207