Fluid-sediment dynamics around a barb: an experimental case study of a hydraulic structure for the Pacific Northwest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three sets of experimental tests are administered in the vicinity of a model barb — a unique hydraulic structure used to provide bank protection for mild-sloped, gravel-bed streams in the Pacific Northwest — under modeled, bankfull conditions. First, experiments are performed using acoustic Doppler velocimetry to provide a description of the flow characteristics around the model barb, as this is the first time that this type of structure has been considered. These initial experiments provide quantitative flow regimes as a guide for scour and spacing tests. Second, scour around the structure is described because existing knowledge in the literature is limited to scour in sand bed streams. Lastly, the performance of the barbs as it relates to bank protection is evaluated using the large-scale particle-image velocimeter for the first time to the authors' knowledge. The results provide quantification of three distinct flow regimes around a barb, scour geometry, and dimensionless ratios for scour depth and spacing for the barbs when designed for bankfull discharge in the Pacific Northwest.Key words: streambank erosion, bank stabilization, barb, flow diversion, hydraulic structure, turbulent eddies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".