MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138092443 · doi:10.1306/intro060110

Sandstone reservoir quality prediction: The state of the art

2010· article· en· W2138092443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyQuality (philosophy)Mining engineeringReservoir modelingPetroleum engineeringPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joanna Ajdukiewicz joined Exxon Production Research Company in 1980. She was Reservoir Quality Assessment and Prediction team lead there from 1991 to 1995 and at Imperial Oil Research Centre in Calgary from 1995 to 1997. Subsequently, she has worked a variety of Exploration Company assignments in the North Sea, Gulf of Mexico, and Middle East. Her current interests are in predicting the distribution of early diagenetic controls on deep reservoir quality. Rob Lander develops diagenetic models for Geocosm LLC. He obtained his Ph.D. in geology from the University of Illinois in 1991, was a research geologist at Exxon Production Research from 1991 to 1993, and worked for Rogaland Research and Geologica AS from 1993 to 2000. He is also a research fellow at the Bureau of Economic Geology. To guess is cheap; to guess wrongly is expensive (Chinese proverb). Reservoir-quality predictive models will be a useful element of risk analysis until remote-sensing tools are invented that accurately measure effective porosity and permeability ahead of the bit. This issue of the AAPG Bulletin highlights recent advances in a new generation of reservoir quality models that have successfully predicted porosity and permeability in diverse siliclastic reservoirs under many different burial conditions. Most previous attempts at predrill reservoir quality prediction have relied on empirical correlations or on first-principle geochemical simulations that incorporate laboratory-derived input parameters (Wood and Byrnes, 1994). The new reservoir quality models differ from previous approaches in that, although incorporating theory-inspired algorithms, they include terms with values that are explicitly designed to be calibrated by, and tested against, data sets of high-quality petrographic analyses that are linked to thermal and effective-stress histories. Petrographic observations therefore provide essential constraints in these models on the types, timing, and rates of key geologic processes affecting sandstone pore systems. This approach avoids the pitfalls inherent …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it