MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138106884 · doi:10.1109/cca.2007.4389307

The Psychological Dynamics of Students in a Classroom: Modeling and Control Strategies Based on Suggestibility Theory

2007· article· en· W2138106884 on OpenAlex
K. Bergey, Kevin Spieser, D.E. Davison

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œproceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/˜The œproceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuggestibilityDynamics (music)Observer (physics)Computer scienceControl (management)Nonlinear systemClass (philosophy)Work (physics)Control theory (sociology)PsychologyCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is motivated by the observation that students in a classroom sometimes seem to behave not as a group of independent individuals, but instead as a collective body. Interaction among students leads to psychological dynamics within the class, specifically the propagation of attitudes from student to student. These dynamics tend to be unstable. The goal of this paper is to investigate if it is possible to find a mathematical model that captures the crowd dynamics, and if it is then possible to use control systems techniques to stabilize a crowd. Our approach is to use suggestibility theory to derive a discrete-time nonlinear model, then use observer-based output-feedback control and some simple nonlinear control techniques. Snapshots from several simulations are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it