MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138144965 · doi:10.1109/acc.2006.1655461

Unknown input observer design for a class of nonlinear systems: an LMI approach

2006· article· en· W2138144965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLinear matrix inequalityNonlinear systemObserver (physics)Control theory (sociology)Lipschitz continuityMATLABToolboxMathematicsClass (philosophy)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A full order nonlinear unknown input observer (NUIO) for a class of Lipschitz nonlinear systems with unknown inputs is designed. A sufficient NUIO existence condition which requires solving a nonlinear matrix inequality is derived. To avoid solving the nonlinear matrix inequality directly, the existence condition is then reformulated as a new sufficient existence condition in terms of an LMI. An important advantage of this LMI based condition is that it enables us to design the proposed full order NUIO using Matlab LMI toolbox and thus makes the difficult NUIO design problem an easy task for the considered class of nonlinear systems. The new sufficient condition, when applied to linear systems, is also necessary. An example is given to show how to use the LMI approach to design the proposed NUIO, and simulation results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207