Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A rapid increase in wireless communication services has occurred during the last years. Infrastructure-less ad-hoc networks emerge as an interesting option to provide pervasive wireless services, although several challenges must be resolved first. Our paper focuses on issues related to signalling and presence management in mobile wireless ad-hoc networks. We present a framework to use SIP in this kind of networks. The objective of this framework is to allow the users of ad-hoc networks to communicate with each other and exchange instant messages. This framework permits the discovery of participants, the establishment, the publishing and the ending of two-party or multiparty sessions by providing SIP (session initiation protocol) extensions. To cope with the bandwidth limitation problem, it is proposed to unify the network layer routing protocols and the application layer SIP REGISTER methods. Scalability of the framework is improved by introducing a clustering approach that group nodes together into clusters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it