Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le contexte social actuel conteste au clinicien les étayages professionnels qui définissent sa pertinence. L’effraction d’une culture qui surinvestit la dimension du public dans le domaine privé de la cure subvertit cet espace aux fins de l’assimiler. Il s’agirait là d’une forme renouvelée de la résistance à la psychanalyse qui met en cause de façon élective les garanties identificatoires minimales nécessaires à l’analyste dans son exercice. Le corpus métapsychologique dans son développement est exemplaire de l’exigence de travail à laquelle le clinicien est soumis aux fins de réinventer les termes de son adhésion au postulat fondamental de la psychanalyse. C’est la possibilité de soutenir cette exigence « scientifique » qui procure au clinicien les assises personnelles requises pour soutenir sa fonction clinique. « Totem et Tabou » est utilisé pour illustrer la démarche épistémologique propre à la psychanalyse, son développement et les progrès théoriques et techniques qu’elle rend possibles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".