A Emergência de Centros de Excelência (COEs) e a Transferência de Conhecimento a partir das Subsidiárias da Pirelli e da Peugeot Citroën do Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo verifica a emergência dos centros de excelência (COEs) e a transferência de conhecimento a partir das subsidiárias estrangeiras da Pirelli e da Peugeot Citroën no Brasil. Através de entrevistas estruturadas com especialistas da indústria automobilística, os resultados permitem concluir que a formação dos COEs é moldada pela própria necessidade de adaptação dos produtos ao mercado local, bem como em função da autonomia adquirida por estas subsidiárias e pela importância e desenvolvimento do mercado brasileiro de automóveis em escala global. Além destes aspectos, os COEs e a transferência de conhecimento ocorrem em função do tempo em que a subsdidiária está instalada no país hospedeiro, assim como sua relevância para os negócios da empresa e relação com a matriz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".