MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138208509 · doi:10.2118/09-06-71

SAGD with a Longer Wellbore

2009· article· en· W2138208509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellborePetroleum engineeringPressure dropDrop (telecommunication)DrillingSteam injectionThermalGeologyEngineeringMechanicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper investigates the feasibility of bitumen production using SAGD technology with a longer wellbore. A longer wellbore can be used to exploit a greater volume of the reservoir with a single wellpair as opposed to multiple wells; thus, decreasing pad and drilling costs. The major concern in using a longer wellbore from a reservoir engineering point of view is the potentially non-uniform steam chamber growth over the whole well length due to pressure drop in the horizontal well. Reservoir simulation was performed using Computer Modelling Group's STARS ™?simulator and the QFlow thermal wellbore simulator to address the issue. The pressure drop inside the wellbore was calculated using QFlow. Reservoir simulations were performed using STARS. A sectioned model was constructed, dividing the whole length of the horizontal wellbore into multiple sections, each with its own pressure restriction to match the pressure drop obtained from QFlow. The results showed that with a sufficiently large wellbore size that resulted in a sufficiently low pressure drop, one longer well performed as well as two shorter wells. When a smaller wellbore size was used, production from a longer well was significantly impeded due to the large pressure drop. Introduction Since the discovery of oil sands, many techniques have been tried - and improved upon - to recover the highly viscous bitumen for energy consumption. One of the methods of bitumen recovery that is becoming increasingly prevalent is a thermal in situ method called Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD). Butler(1) first proposed this method in the late 1970s and it was field tested in AOSTRA's Underground Test Facility (UTF) in the 1980s. The initial phase of UTF testing produced successful field results(2, 3). Following Phase A, Phase B was started, implementing the use of longer horizontal wells(4, 5). Surface-operated SAGD was studied in Phase D(6). Following these successful pilot tests, a number of commercial projects have been developed, including Petro-Canada's MacKay River project. One of the factors that needs to be considered in commercial projects is the optimization of the horizontal well length. Typically, the horizontal sections of the SAGD wells are 500 to 700 m long. This paper will examine the effectiveness of using a longer horizontal wellbore in SAGD. There is tremendous potential for economic savings in implementing longer wellbores in a SAGD project. A longer wellbore has the ability to reach greater lengths within a reservoir with one single wellbore as opposed to multiple wells. When multiple wells are drilled, multiple pads must also be built - one for each group of wells. Thus, to cover a given reservoir, the average pad cost will be lower for longer wellbores. Another significant cost advantage of the longer wellbore is the fact that fewer riser sections (also known as build sections) need to be drilled and completed. The riser section has a significantly higher cost than the horizontal section because it is generally much larger in diameter. By decreasing the number of wells in a pattern with the use of longer wells, the cost of all the riser sections is decreased significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it